← Resources

Diligence

How to Manage Unresolved Risks Before an Investment Decision cover

How to Manage Unresolved Risks Before an Investment Decision

An investment diligence risk register for lean venture teams, with blocker statuses, responsible owners, evidence and an illustrative decision.

By Cesar FigueredoPublished Updated

Cesar Figueredo is the founder and CEO of Treto and a former venture capital investor.

Every venture investment involves uncertainty. A useful diligence process makes the material unknowns visible and distinguishes questions that can remain open from those that prevent the firm from approving or closing an investment.

Write a decision-relevant risk statement

A risk should identify the proposition at issue and its consequence for the thesis. 'Customer concentration' is a category. 'The largest customer represents 32% of illustrative ARR and has a termination option next quarter' is a question an investor can verify.

Use a risk register that fits a small team

For each open item record: company and financing process; question or failure scenario; evidence and date; estimated decision consequence; status; owner; next request; expected resolution time; and the authority that may accept residual uncertainty.

Useful statuses include Open, Evidence requested, Specialist review, Resolved, Risk explicitly accepted and Decision blocker. Acceptance is an intentional decision by the authorized reviewer, with assumptions attached. A missing document is not itself a passed check.

Illustrative register

Fictional investment: Northpoint Software. Risk A: reported 115% NRR lacks a cohort export; the analyst requests a dated customer ledger, status Decision blocker. Risk B: one integration depends on a third-party API with an upcoming contract renewal; technical specialist reviews continuity, status Specialist review. Risk C: product usage is concentrated in a narrow industry; the investment partner accepts the early-stage concentration as part of the thesis, status Risk explicitly accepted.

The fund would record who can clear each item. A partner may accept a market uncertainty consistent with the strategy. Counsel should resolve a security-issuance authority issue under the executed financing documents. The investment committee should be informed before closing if a material assumption changes.

Connect each issue to an evidence request

An actionable request tells the company what is needed, why it matters and which period or definition to use. For the NRR case, specify the opening customer cohort, expansion, contraction and churn over the same twelve months. The NRR and GRR guide provides the metric perimeter.

Decide which uncertainties can be accepted

No checklist eliminates venture risk. A pre-product technical company may have no recurring-revenue history. The fund can evaluate progress through technical milestones and team capability, while documenting that future customer demand remains a major assumption. Corporate ownership, valid issuance authority and material undisclosed liabilities require appropriate legal scrutiny.

Carry blockers into the investment memo

The investment memo should show the strongest counterargument, open evidence and the terms under which approval is valid. Investment committee process design helps define who can approve an exception or material change.

Review risks after financing decisions

If a condition remains relevant to the portfolio, assign a post-close owner and monitoring date under the approved decision. Keep it distinct from a condition that legally must be cleared before closing. The original risk register can later help explain why an outcome differed from underwriting.

Where Treto fits

Treto's Diligence workspace maintains questions and supporting source context around the deal. The investment team owns risk decisions, and formal legal, technical and accounting reviews remain with the responsible specialists.

Questions investors ask

Can a VC fund invest with unresolved diligence risks?

Investment committees can knowingly accept some business uncertainty within their mandate, subject to the fund's rules. Conditions tied to legal authority, investor rights or other required approvals must follow the executed documents. The decision record should identify which matters are accepted and which still block closing.

How often should an open-risk register be reviewed?

Review material issues when new evidence arrives and before each investment decision or closing milestone. A weekly team review may be practical during active diligence. Owners and dates should be updated when a dependency changes.

Share

Resources

Continue reading